Breastfeeding is widely recognised as a far more environmentally friendly option than formula feeding, a conclusion supported by the research of Dr Julie Smith and numerous other scholars in public health and environmental science. The environmental advantages of breastfeeding stem from its minimal resource use, negligible waste generation, and dramatically lower carbon footprint compared to the industrial processes required for formula production.
Breastfeeding requires no external inputs of water, energy, or raw materials beyond the mother’s nutritional needs. In contrast, formula feeding involves a resource-intensive supply chain: dairy farming (with associated methane emissions), crop cultivation for cattle feed, water for livestock and processing, manufacturing, packaging, and global transportation.
Dr Julie Smith’s research, including the Greenfeeding Tool developed at the Australian National University, quantifies these impacts: producing just 1 kg of infant formula generates approximately 4 kg of CO₂ equivalent emissions, not even accounting for retail and household use. Life cycle assessments reveal that formula feeding for six months emits an estimated 95–153 kg CO₂ equivalent per baby, compared to breastfeeding. If all babies in the UK were breastfed for six months, the carbon savings would be equivalent to removing 50,000–77,500 cars from the road annually.
Breastfeeding produces virtually no waste. No packaging, bottles, teats, or sterilisation equipment are needed, eliminating the plastic and metal waste associated with formula feeding. In its development, ecobub™, (global company based in Australia, that makes nursing nipple shields), has been mindful of sustainability throughout development chain.
Formula feeding generates significant packaging waste, transport, and even requires energy for sterilizing feeding equipment. This further increases its environmental burden.
Formula production is highly water-intensive, consuming vast amounts for animal hydration, crop irrigation, and processing. It contributes to deforestation, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem strain.
Globally, formula feeding for infants under six months results in the use of over 2.5 trillion litres of water and up to 7.5 billion kg CO₂ equivalent emissions annually.
To explain that visually, every year, infant formula feeding uses enough water to fill 1 million Olympic swimming pools — and produces as much carbon pollution as driving 1.5 billion cars for a day.
Breastfeeding is inherently sustainable: it is a local, unprocessed, and renewable food source that supports both infant health and planetary health. It requires no transportation ('food miles') and is resilient in emergencies when infrastructure for formula production and distribution may be disrupted.
In summary, breastfeeding’s minimal carbon footprint, zero waste, and negligible resource use make it the most environmentally sustainable form of infant feeding. In contrast, formula feeding’s reliance on industrial agriculture, manufacturing, packaging, and distribution results in significant environmental harm at every stage of its lifecycle.
This is not medical advice. For medical advice, please consult your health professional.
Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.